- `.Ref` and `.RelRef` take a reference (the logical filename for a
page, including extension and/or a document fragment ID) and return
a permalink (or relative permalink) to the referenced document.
- If the reference is a page name (such as `about.md`), the page
will be discovered and the permalink will be returned: `/about/`
- If the reference is a page name with a fragment (such as
`about.md#who`), the page will be discovered and used to add the
`page.UniqueID()` to the resulting fragment and permalink:
`/about/#who:deadbeef`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Node` or `SiteInfo`, it will be returned as is: `#who`.
- If the reference is a fragment and `.*Ref` has been called from
a `Page`, it will be returned with the page’s unique ID:
`#who:deadbeef`.
- `.*Ref` can be called from either `Node`, `SiteInfo` (e.g.,
`Node.Site`), `Page` objects, or `ShortcodeWithPage` objects in
templates.
- `.*Ref` cannot be used in content, so two shortcodes have been
created to provide the functionality to content: `ref` and `relref`.
These are intended to be used within markup, like `[Who]({{% ref
about.md#who %}})` or `<a href="{{% ref about.md#who %}}">Who</a>`.
- There are also `ref` and `relref` template functions (used to create
the shortcodes) that expect a `Page` or `Node` object and the
reference string (e.g., `{{ relref . "about.md" }}` or `{{
"about.md" | ref . }}`). It actually looks for `.*Ref` as defined on
`Node` or `Page` objects.
- Shortcode handling had to use a *differently unique* wrapper in
`createShortcodePlaceholder` because of the way that the `ref` and
`relref` are intended to be used in content.
Prior to this commit, `HasMenuCurrent` and `IsMenuCurrent` on `Node` always returned false.
This made it hard (if possible at all) to mark the currently selected menu item/group for non-Page content (home page, category pages etc.), i.e. for menus defined in the site configuration.
This commit provides an implementation of these two methods.
Notable design choices:
* These menu items have a loose coupling to the the resources they navigate to; the `Url` is the best common identificator. To facilitate a consistent matching, and to get it in line with the menu items connected to `Page`, relative Urls (Urls starting with '/') for menu items in the site configuration are converted to permaLinks using the same rules used for others’.
* `IsMenuCurrent` only looks at the children of the current node; this is in line with the implementation on `Page`.
* Due to this loose coupling, `IsMenuCurrent` have to search downards in the tree to make sure that the node is inside the current menu. This could have been made simpler if it could answer `yes` to any match of any menu item matching the current resource.
This commit also adds a set of unit tests for the menu system.
Fixes#367
The render code path would use a fallback if there was an exception.
This change instead relies on explicit declaration of the layout to use
and includes a check to see if the layout indeed exists before
attempting to render it.
It started with wanting to move templates in template bundles and the
rest followed. I did my best to start grouping related functions
together, but there are some that I missed. There is also the method
Urlize that seems to be a special function used in both worlds. I'll
need to revisit this method.
