hugo/parser/pageparser/pagelexer.go

520 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2018 The Hugo Authors. All rights reserved.
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
//
2015-11-24 03:16:36 +00:00
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
2015-11-24 03:16:36 +00:00
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package pageparser
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
import (
"bytes"
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
"fmt"
"unicode"
"unicode/utf8"
)
const eof = -1
// returns the next state in scanner.
type stateFunc func(*pageLexer) stateFunc
type pageLexer struct {
input []byte
stateStart stateFunc
state stateFunc
pos int // input position
start int // item start position
width int // width of last element
// Contains lexers for shortcodes and other main section
// elements.
sectionHandlers *sectionHandlers
cfg Config
// The summary divider to look for.
summaryDivider []byte
// Set when we have parsed any summary divider
summaryDividerChecked bool
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
lexerShortcodeState
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// items delivered to client
items Items
all: Rework page store, add a dynacache, improve partial rebuilds, and some general spring cleaning There are some breaking changes in this commit, see #11455. Closes #11455 Closes #11549 This fixes a set of bugs (see issue list) and it is also paying some technical debt accumulated over the years. We now build with Staticcheck enabled in the CI build. The performance should be about the same as before for regular sized Hugo sites, but it should perform and scale much better to larger data sets, as objects that uses lots of memory (e.g. rendered Markdown, big JSON files read into maps with transform.Unmarshal etc.) will now get automatically garbage collected if needed. Performance on partial rebuilds when running the server in fast render mode should be the same, but the change detection should be much more accurate. A list of the notable new features: * A new dependency tracker that covers (almost) all of Hugo's API and is used to do fine grained partial rebuilds when running the server. * A new and simpler tree document store which allows fast lookups and prefix-walking in all dimensions (e.g. language) concurrently. * You can now configure an upper memory limit allowing for much larger data sets and/or running on lower specced PCs. We have lifted the "no resources in sub folders" restriction for branch bundles (e.g. sections). Memory Limit * Hugos will, by default, set aside a quarter of the total system memory, but you can set this via the OS environment variable HUGO_MEMORYLIMIT (in gigabytes). This is backed by a partitioned LRU cache used throughout Hugo. A cache that gets dynamically resized in low memory situations, allowing Go's Garbage Collector to free the memory. New Dependency Tracker: Hugo has had a rule based coarse grained approach to server rebuilds that has worked mostly pretty well, but there have been some surprises (e.g. stale content). This is now revamped with a new dependency tracker that can quickly calculate the delta given a changed resource (e.g. a content file, template, JS file etc.). This handles transitive relations, e.g. $page -> js.Build -> JS import, or $page1.Content -> render hook -> site.GetPage -> $page2.Title, or $page1.Content -> shortcode -> partial -> site.RegularPages -> $page2.Content -> shortcode ..., and should also handle changes to aggregated values (e.g. site.Lastmod) effectively. This covers all of Hugo's API with 2 known exceptions (a list that may not be fully exhaustive): Changes to files loaded with template func os.ReadFile may not be handled correctly. We recommend loading resources with resources.Get Changes to Hugo objects (e.g. Page) passed in the template context to lang.Translate may not be detected correctly. We recommend having simple i18n templates without too much data context passed in other than simple types such as strings and numbers. Note that the cachebuster configuration (when A changes then rebuild B) works well with the above, but we recommend that you revise that configuration, as it in most situations should not be needed. One example where it is still needed is with TailwindCSS and using changes to hugo_stats.json to trigger new CSS rebuilds. Document Store: Previously, a little simplified, we split the document store (where we store pages and resources) in a tree per language. This worked pretty well, but the structure made some operations harder than they needed to be. We have now restructured it into one Radix tree for all languages. Internally the language is considered to be a dimension of that tree, and the tree can be viewed in all dimensions concurrently. This makes some operations re. language simpler (e.g. finding translations is just a slice range), but the idea is that it should also be relatively inexpensive to add more dimensions if needed (e.g. role). Fixes #10169 Fixes #10364 Fixes #10482 Fixes #10630 Fixes #10656 Fixes #10694 Fixes #10918 Fixes #11262 Fixes #11439 Fixes #11453 Fixes #11457 Fixes #11466 Fixes #11540 Fixes #11551 Fixes #11556 Fixes #11654 Fixes #11661 Fixes #11663 Fixes #11664 Fixes #11669 Fixes #11671 Fixes #11807 Fixes #11808 Fixes #11809 Fixes #11815 Fixes #11840 Fixes #11853 Fixes #11860 Fixes #11883 Fixes #11904 Fixes #7388 Fixes #7425 Fixes #7436 Fixes #7544 Fixes #7882 Fixes #7960 Fixes #8255 Fixes #8307 Fixes #8863 Fixes #8927 Fixes #9192 Fixes #9324
2023-12-24 18:11:05 +00:00
// error delivered to the client
err error
}
// Implement the Result interface
func (l *pageLexer) Iterator() *Iterator {
return NewIterator(l.items)
}
func (l *pageLexer) Input() []byte {
return l.input
}
type Config struct{}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// note: the input position here is normally 0 (start), but
// can be set if position of first shortcode is known
func newPageLexer(input []byte, stateStart stateFunc, cfg Config) *pageLexer {
lexer := &pageLexer{
input: input,
stateStart: stateStart,
cfg: cfg,
lexerShortcodeState: lexerShortcodeState{
currLeftDelimItem: tLeftDelimScNoMarkup,
currRightDelimItem: tRightDelimScNoMarkup,
openShortcodes: make(map[string]bool),
},
items: make([]Item, 0, 5),
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
}
lexer.sectionHandlers = createSectionHandlers(lexer)
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
return lexer
}
// main loop
func (l *pageLexer) run() *pageLexer {
for l.state = l.stateStart; l.state != nil; {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.state = l.state(l)
}
return l
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
}
// Page syntax
var (
byteOrderMark = '\ufeff'
summaryDivider = []byte("<!--more-->")
summaryDividerOrg = []byte("# more")
delimTOML = []byte("+++")
delimYAML = []byte("---")
delimOrg = []byte("#+")
)
func (l *pageLexer) next() rune {
if l.pos >= len(l.input) {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.width = 0
return eof
}
runeValue, runeWidth := utf8.DecodeRune(l.input[l.pos:])
l.width = runeWidth
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.pos += l.width
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
return runeValue
}
// peek, but no consume
func (l *pageLexer) peek() rune {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
r := l.next()
l.backup()
return r
}
// steps back one
func (l *pageLexer) backup() {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.pos -= l.width
}
func (l *pageLexer) append(item Item) {
if item.Pos() < len(l.input) {
item.firstByte = l.input[item.Pos()]
}
l.items = append(l.items, item)
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// sends an item back to the client.
func (l *pageLexer) emit(t ItemType) {
defer func() {
l.start = l.pos
}()
if t == tText {
// Identify any trailing whitespace/intendation.
// We currently only care about the last one.
for i := l.pos - 1; i >= l.start; i-- {
b := l.input[i]
if b != ' ' && b != '\t' && b != '\r' && b != '\n' {
break
}
if i == l.start && b != '\n' {
l.append(Item{Type: tIndentation, low: l.start, high: l.pos})
return
} else if b == '\n' && i < l.pos-1 {
l.append(Item{Type: t, low: l.start, high: i + 1})
l.append(Item{Type: tIndentation, low: i + 1, high: l.pos})
return
} else if b == '\n' && i == l.pos-1 {
break
}
}
}
l.append(Item{Type: t, low: l.start, high: l.pos})
}
// sends a string item back to the client.
func (l *pageLexer) emitString(t ItemType) {
l.append(Item{Type: t, low: l.start, high: l.pos, isString: true})
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.start = l.pos
}
func (l *pageLexer) isEOF() bool {
return l.pos >= len(l.input)
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// special case, do not send '\\' back to client
func (l *pageLexer) ignoreEscapesAndEmit(t ItemType, isString bool) {
i := l.start
k := i
var segments []lowHigh
for i < l.pos {
r, w := utf8.DecodeRune(l.input[i:l.pos])
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
if r == '\\' {
if i > k {
segments = append(segments, lowHigh{k, i})
}
// See issue #10236.
// We don't send the backslash back to the client,
// which makes the end parsing simpler.
// This means that we cannot render the AST back to be
// exactly the same as the input,
// but that was also the situation before we introduced the issue in #10236.
k = i + w
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
}
i += w
}
if k < l.pos {
segments = append(segments, lowHigh{k, l.pos})
}
if len(segments) > 0 {
l.append(Item{Type: t, segments: segments})
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.start = l.pos
}
// gets the current value (for debugging and error handling)
func (l *pageLexer) current() []byte {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
return l.input[l.start:l.pos]
}
// ignore current element
func (l *pageLexer) ignore() {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.start = l.pos
}
var lf = []byte("\n")
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// nil terminates the parser
func (l *pageLexer) errorf(format string, args ...any) stateFunc {
all: Rework page store, add a dynacache, improve partial rebuilds, and some general spring cleaning There are some breaking changes in this commit, see #11455. Closes #11455 Closes #11549 This fixes a set of bugs (see issue list) and it is also paying some technical debt accumulated over the years. We now build with Staticcheck enabled in the CI build. The performance should be about the same as before for regular sized Hugo sites, but it should perform and scale much better to larger data sets, as objects that uses lots of memory (e.g. rendered Markdown, big JSON files read into maps with transform.Unmarshal etc.) will now get automatically garbage collected if needed. Performance on partial rebuilds when running the server in fast render mode should be the same, but the change detection should be much more accurate. A list of the notable new features: * A new dependency tracker that covers (almost) all of Hugo's API and is used to do fine grained partial rebuilds when running the server. * A new and simpler tree document store which allows fast lookups and prefix-walking in all dimensions (e.g. language) concurrently. * You can now configure an upper memory limit allowing for much larger data sets and/or running on lower specced PCs. We have lifted the "no resources in sub folders" restriction for branch bundles (e.g. sections). Memory Limit * Hugos will, by default, set aside a quarter of the total system memory, but you can set this via the OS environment variable HUGO_MEMORYLIMIT (in gigabytes). This is backed by a partitioned LRU cache used throughout Hugo. A cache that gets dynamically resized in low memory situations, allowing Go's Garbage Collector to free the memory. New Dependency Tracker: Hugo has had a rule based coarse grained approach to server rebuilds that has worked mostly pretty well, but there have been some surprises (e.g. stale content). This is now revamped with a new dependency tracker that can quickly calculate the delta given a changed resource (e.g. a content file, template, JS file etc.). This handles transitive relations, e.g. $page -> js.Build -> JS import, or $page1.Content -> render hook -> site.GetPage -> $page2.Title, or $page1.Content -> shortcode -> partial -> site.RegularPages -> $page2.Content -> shortcode ..., and should also handle changes to aggregated values (e.g. site.Lastmod) effectively. This covers all of Hugo's API with 2 known exceptions (a list that may not be fully exhaustive): Changes to files loaded with template func os.ReadFile may not be handled correctly. We recommend loading resources with resources.Get Changes to Hugo objects (e.g. Page) passed in the template context to lang.Translate may not be detected correctly. We recommend having simple i18n templates without too much data context passed in other than simple types such as strings and numbers. Note that the cachebuster configuration (when A changes then rebuild B) works well with the above, but we recommend that you revise that configuration, as it in most situations should not be needed. One example where it is still needed is with TailwindCSS and using changes to hugo_stats.json to trigger new CSS rebuilds. Document Store: Previously, a little simplified, we split the document store (where we store pages and resources) in a tree per language. This worked pretty well, but the structure made some operations harder than they needed to be. We have now restructured it into one Radix tree for all languages. Internally the language is considered to be a dimension of that tree, and the tree can be viewed in all dimensions concurrently. This makes some operations re. language simpler (e.g. finding translations is just a slice range), but the idea is that it should also be relatively inexpensive to add more dimensions if needed (e.g. role). Fixes #10169 Fixes #10364 Fixes #10482 Fixes #10630 Fixes #10656 Fixes #10694 Fixes #10918 Fixes #11262 Fixes #11439 Fixes #11453 Fixes #11457 Fixes #11466 Fixes #11540 Fixes #11551 Fixes #11556 Fixes #11654 Fixes #11661 Fixes #11663 Fixes #11664 Fixes #11669 Fixes #11671 Fixes #11807 Fixes #11808 Fixes #11809 Fixes #11815 Fixes #11840 Fixes #11853 Fixes #11860 Fixes #11883 Fixes #11904 Fixes #7388 Fixes #7425 Fixes #7436 Fixes #7544 Fixes #7882 Fixes #7960 Fixes #8255 Fixes #8307 Fixes #8863 Fixes #8927 Fixes #9192 Fixes #9324
2023-12-24 18:11:05 +00:00
l.append(Item{Type: tError, Err: fmt.Errorf(format, args...), low: l.start, high: l.pos})
return nil
}
func (l *pageLexer) consumeCRLF() bool {
var consumed bool
for _, r := range crLf {
if l.next() != r {
l.backup()
} else {
consumed = true
}
}
return consumed
}
func (l *pageLexer) consumeToSpace() {
for {
r := l.next()
if r == eof || unicode.IsSpace(r) {
l.backup()
return
}
}
}
func (l *pageLexer) consumeSpace() {
for {
r := l.next()
if r == eof || !unicode.IsSpace(r) {
l.backup()
return
}
}
}
type sectionHandlers struct {
l *pageLexer
// Set when none of the sections are found so we
// can safely stop looking and skip to the end.
skipAll bool
handlers []*sectionHandler
skipIndexes []int
}
func (s *sectionHandlers) skip() int {
if s.skipAll {
return -1
}
s.skipIndexes = s.skipIndexes[:0]
var shouldSkip bool
for _, skipper := range s.handlers {
idx := skipper.skip()
if idx != -1 {
shouldSkip = true
s.skipIndexes = append(s.skipIndexes, idx)
}
}
if !shouldSkip {
s.skipAll = true
return -1
}
return minIndex(s.skipIndexes...)
}
func createSectionHandlers(l *pageLexer) *sectionHandlers {
shortCodeHandler := &sectionHandler{
l: l,
skipFunc: func(l *pageLexer) int {
return l.index(leftDelimSc)
},
lexFunc: func(origin stateFunc, l *pageLexer) (stateFunc, bool) {
if !l.isShortCodeStart() {
return origin, false
}
if l.isInline {
// If we're inside an inline shortcode, the only valid shortcode markup is
// the markup which closes it.
b := l.input[l.pos+3:]
end := indexNonWhiteSpace(b, '/')
if end != len(l.input)-1 {
b = bytes.TrimSpace(b[end+1:])
if end == -1 || !bytes.HasPrefix(b, []byte(l.currShortcodeName+" ")) {
return l.errorf("inline shortcodes do not support nesting"), true
}
}
}
if l.hasPrefix(leftDelimScWithMarkup) {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
l.currLeftDelimItem = tLeftDelimScWithMarkup
l.currRightDelimItem = tRightDelimScWithMarkup
} else {
l.currLeftDelimItem = tLeftDelimScNoMarkup
l.currRightDelimItem = tRightDelimScNoMarkup
}
return lexShortcodeLeftDelim, true
},
}
summaryDividerHandler := &sectionHandler{
l: l,
skipFunc: func(l *pageLexer) int {
if l.summaryDividerChecked || l.summaryDivider == nil {
return -1
}
return l.index(l.summaryDivider)
},
lexFunc: func(origin stateFunc, l *pageLexer) (stateFunc, bool) {
if !l.hasPrefix(l.summaryDivider) {
return origin, false
}
l.summaryDividerChecked = true
l.pos += len(l.summaryDivider)
// This makes it a little easier to reason about later.
l.consumeSpace()
l.emit(TypeLeadSummaryDivider)
return origin, true
},
}
handlers := []*sectionHandler{shortCodeHandler, summaryDividerHandler}
return &sectionHandlers{
l: l,
handlers: handlers,
skipIndexes: make([]int, len(handlers)),
}
}
func (s *sectionHandlers) lex(origin stateFunc) stateFunc {
if s.skipAll {
return nil
}
if s.l.pos > s.l.start {
s.l.emit(tText)
}
for _, handler := range s.handlers {
if handler.skipAll {
continue
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
}
next, handled := handler.lexFunc(origin, handler.l)
if next == nil || handled {
return next
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
}
// Not handled by the above.
s.l.pos++
return origin
}
type sectionHandler struct {
l *pageLexer
// No more sections of this type.
skipAll bool
// Returns the index of the next match, -1 if none found.
skipFunc func(l *pageLexer) int
// Lex lexes the current section and returns the next state func and
// a bool telling if this section was handled.
// Note that returning nil as the next state will terminate the
// lexer.
lexFunc func(origin stateFunc, l *pageLexer) (stateFunc, bool)
}
func (s *sectionHandler) skip() int {
if s.skipAll {
return -1
}
idx := s.skipFunc(s.l)
if idx == -1 {
s.skipAll = true
}
return idx
}
func lexMainSection(l *pageLexer) stateFunc {
if l.isEOF() {
return lexDone
}
// Fast forward as far as possible.
skip := l.sectionHandlers.skip()
if skip == -1 {
l.pos = len(l.input)
return lexDone
} else if skip > 0 {
l.pos += skip
}
next := l.sectionHandlers.lex(lexMainSection)
if next != nil {
return next
}
l.pos = len(l.input)
return lexDone
}
func lexDone(l *pageLexer) stateFunc {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// Done!
if l.pos > l.start {
l.emit(tText)
}
l.emit(tEOF)
return nil
}
all: Rework page store, add a dynacache, improve partial rebuilds, and some general spring cleaning There are some breaking changes in this commit, see #11455. Closes #11455 Closes #11549 This fixes a set of bugs (see issue list) and it is also paying some technical debt accumulated over the years. We now build with Staticcheck enabled in the CI build. The performance should be about the same as before for regular sized Hugo sites, but it should perform and scale much better to larger data sets, as objects that uses lots of memory (e.g. rendered Markdown, big JSON files read into maps with transform.Unmarshal etc.) will now get automatically garbage collected if needed. Performance on partial rebuilds when running the server in fast render mode should be the same, but the change detection should be much more accurate. A list of the notable new features: * A new dependency tracker that covers (almost) all of Hugo's API and is used to do fine grained partial rebuilds when running the server. * A new and simpler tree document store which allows fast lookups and prefix-walking in all dimensions (e.g. language) concurrently. * You can now configure an upper memory limit allowing for much larger data sets and/or running on lower specced PCs. We have lifted the "no resources in sub folders" restriction for branch bundles (e.g. sections). Memory Limit * Hugos will, by default, set aside a quarter of the total system memory, but you can set this via the OS environment variable HUGO_MEMORYLIMIT (in gigabytes). This is backed by a partitioned LRU cache used throughout Hugo. A cache that gets dynamically resized in low memory situations, allowing Go's Garbage Collector to free the memory. New Dependency Tracker: Hugo has had a rule based coarse grained approach to server rebuilds that has worked mostly pretty well, but there have been some surprises (e.g. stale content). This is now revamped with a new dependency tracker that can quickly calculate the delta given a changed resource (e.g. a content file, template, JS file etc.). This handles transitive relations, e.g. $page -> js.Build -> JS import, or $page1.Content -> render hook -> site.GetPage -> $page2.Title, or $page1.Content -> shortcode -> partial -> site.RegularPages -> $page2.Content -> shortcode ..., and should also handle changes to aggregated values (e.g. site.Lastmod) effectively. This covers all of Hugo's API with 2 known exceptions (a list that may not be fully exhaustive): Changes to files loaded with template func os.ReadFile may not be handled correctly. We recommend loading resources with resources.Get Changes to Hugo objects (e.g. Page) passed in the template context to lang.Translate may not be detected correctly. We recommend having simple i18n templates without too much data context passed in other than simple types such as strings and numbers. Note that the cachebuster configuration (when A changes then rebuild B) works well with the above, but we recommend that you revise that configuration, as it in most situations should not be needed. One example where it is still needed is with TailwindCSS and using changes to hugo_stats.json to trigger new CSS rebuilds. Document Store: Previously, a little simplified, we split the document store (where we store pages and resources) in a tree per language. This worked pretty well, but the structure made some operations harder than they needed to be. We have now restructured it into one Radix tree for all languages. Internally the language is considered to be a dimension of that tree, and the tree can be viewed in all dimensions concurrently. This makes some operations re. language simpler (e.g. finding translations is just a slice range), but the idea is that it should also be relatively inexpensive to add more dimensions if needed (e.g. role). Fixes #10169 Fixes #10364 Fixes #10482 Fixes #10630 Fixes #10656 Fixes #10694 Fixes #10918 Fixes #11262 Fixes #11439 Fixes #11453 Fixes #11457 Fixes #11466 Fixes #11540 Fixes #11551 Fixes #11556 Fixes #11654 Fixes #11661 Fixes #11663 Fixes #11664 Fixes #11669 Fixes #11671 Fixes #11807 Fixes #11808 Fixes #11809 Fixes #11815 Fixes #11840 Fixes #11853 Fixes #11860 Fixes #11883 Fixes #11904 Fixes #7388 Fixes #7425 Fixes #7436 Fixes #7544 Fixes #7882 Fixes #7960 Fixes #8255 Fixes #8307 Fixes #8863 Fixes #8927 Fixes #9192 Fixes #9324
2023-12-24 18:11:05 +00:00
//lint:ignore U1000 useful for debugging
func (l *pageLexer) printCurrentInput() {
fmt.Printf("input[%d:]: %q", l.pos, string(l.input[l.pos:]))
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// state helpers
func (l *pageLexer) index(sep []byte) int {
return bytes.Index(l.input[l.pos:], sep)
}
func (l *pageLexer) hasPrefix(prefix []byte) bool {
return bytes.HasPrefix(l.input[l.pos:], prefix)
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// helper functions
// returns the min index >= 0
func minIndex(indices ...int) int {
min := -1
for _, j := range indices {
if j < 0 {
continue
}
if min == -1 {
min = j
} else if j < min {
min = j
}
}
return min
}
func indexNonWhiteSpace(s []byte, in rune) int {
idx := bytes.IndexFunc(s, func(r rune) bool {
return !unicode.IsSpace(r)
})
if idx == -1 {
return -1
}
r, _ := utf8.DecodeRune(s[idx:])
if r == in {
return idx
}
return -1
}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
func isSpace(r rune) bool {
return r == ' ' || r == '\t'
}
func isAlphaNumericOrHyphen(r rune) bool {
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
// let unquoted YouTube ids as positional params slip through (they contain hyphens)
return isAlphaNumeric(r) || r == '-'
}
var crLf = []rune{'\r', '\n'}
Shortcode rewrite, take 2 This commit contains a restructuring and partial rewrite of the shortcode handling. Prior to this commit rendering of the page content was mingled with handling of the shortcodes. This led to several oddities. The new flow is: 1. Shortcodes are extracted from page and replaced with placeholders. 2. Shortcodes are processed and rendered 3. Page is processed 4. The placeholders are replaced with the rendered shortcodes The handling of summaries is also made simpler by this. This commit also introduces some other chenges: 1. distinction between shortcodes that need further processing and those who do not: * `{{< >}}`: Typically raw HTML. Will not be processed. * `{{% %}}`: Will be processed by the page's markup engine (Markdown or (infuture) Asciidoctor) The above also involves a new shortcode-parser, with lexical scanning inspired by Rob Pike's talk called "Lexical Scanning in Go", which should be easier to understand, give better error messages and perform better. 2. If you want to exclude a shortcode from being processed (for documentation etc.), the inner part of the shorcode must be commented out, i.e. `{{%/* movie 47238zzb */%}}`. See the updated shortcode section in the documentation for further examples. The new parser supports nested shortcodes. This isn't new, but has two related design choices worth mentioning: * The shortcodes will be rendered individually, so If both `{{< >}}` and `{{% %}}` are used in the nested hierarchy, one will be passed through the page's markdown processor, the other not. * To avoid potential costly overhead of always looking far ahead for a possible closing tag, this implementation looks at the template itself, and is branded as a container with inner content if it contains a reference to `.Inner` Fixes #565 Fixes #480 Fixes #461 And probably some others.
2014-10-27 20:48:30 +00:00
func isEndOfLine(r rune) bool {
return r == '\r' || r == '\n'
}
func isAlphaNumeric(r rune) bool {
return r == '_' || unicode.IsLetter(r) || unicode.IsDigit(r)
}